Wikipedia reliable source

Evaluating Digital Sources. Because so much information is now available online, it’s important to know how to navigate digital sources versus print sources. Today, almost every print source has a digital edition (e.g., ebooks, online newspapers), and some academic journals only publish digitally. However, despite the many credible digital ...

Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to professors, as the easiest source of information about anything and everything. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may not be considered acceptable, because Wikipedia is not a creditable source.Jan 9, 2021 · Since 2018 Facebook has used Wikipedia to provide information buttons with the sources of news articles. ... embarrassments—and its own disclaimer that “Wikipedia is not a reliable source ... The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard. This is a list of websites that editors frequently discuss on Wikipedia. Some of these are currently accepted, some are currently opposed, and some depend on the circumstances as consensus can change.. Note that the standards for WP:External links and WP:Reliable sources are different, so that a web page might be acceptable as an external link, but not …By identifying politically biased language in Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia, Feng Zhu hopes to learn whether professional editors or open-sourced experts provide the most objective entries.Wikipedia's guideline on Reliable sources states that "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Wikipedia's guideline on Notability states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to ...

If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements. Avoid stating facts as opinions. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice.The online encyclopedia does not guarantee the validity of its information. It is seen as a valuable "starting point" for researchers when they pass over content to examine the listed references, citations, and sources. Academics suggest reviewing reliable sources when assessing the quality of articles. [20] [21] See moreIf available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources on topics such as history, medicine, and science. Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include: University-level textbooksReliable sources, generally, are third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.13 oct 2020 ... Q: Why do we use Wikipedia for lateral reading? Since when has Wikipedia become a reliable source? A: I love your skepticism! I also like that ...

Explain Wikipedia’s history and operations, and how these features can influence the site’s contents. Articulate the appropriate uses of Wikipedia. Participate in Wikipedia as an editor, creator and curator of original content. The Least Reliable Source, Or Is It? Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. About us. The demand for good-quality statistical data continues to increase. Timely and reliable statistics are key inputs to the broad development strategy. Improvements in the quality and quantity of data on all aspects of development are essential if we are to achieve the goal of a world without poverty.One place to look for additional sources to use in assessing the quality of a Wikipedia article is to look at the sources it cites. An article that faithfully reflects the information and intent of a large number of high quality sources is likely to be a very reliable indicator of the current state of knowledge on a subject. The online encyclopedia does not guarantee the validity of its information. It is seen as a valuable "starting point" for researchers when they pass over content to examine the listed references, citations, and sources. Academics suggest reviewing reliable sources when assessing the quality of articles. [20] [21]

Cheap gas in las cruces nm.

Saraswati, is a Sanskrit fusion word of saras (सरस्) meaning "pooling water", but also sometimes translated as "speech"; and vati (वती) meaning "she who possesses". Originally associated with the river or rivers known as Saraswati, this combination, therefore, means "she who has ponds, lakes, and pooling water" or occasionally ...Wiki-Transpose rely only on Wikipedia as information source for translations. The main goal of this paper is to check the coverage ratio of Wikipedia against specializedqueries …May 15, 2023 · Beware of sources on the internet that look like trade/professional articles, but don't have reliable content. Magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established newspapers - written for a general audience by authors or journalists who have consulted reliable sources and vetted through an editor. These sources may provide ... The question is whether commercially available DVD's of firemen and other eyewitness constitutes a Wikipedia "Reliable Source." I don't see why it shouldn't. That would appear to have about the same status as a book. If we see an identifiable fireman on a commercially available DVD making a statement, it should be clear that he made the statement.A secondary source summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources. In general, Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable secondary sources. A tertiary source is usually a document that summarizes primary, secondary and other tertiary sources. Encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, are tertiary sources.

If there's an outside and reliable source documenting his view, sure. The website could be acceptable (but unnecessary given that we have the book) as an additional source to prove the quote is indeed him, but neither the website nor his book are reliable for whether his views are due weight, since his other books (particularly his advocacy of the Mosaic …If you wear contact lenses, you know how important it is to have a reliable source for ordering them. In recent years, the popularity of online ordering contacts has skyrocketed, providing a convenient and efficient way to purchase your len...ME: Not only Facebook can be a primary and reliable source, it's also the virtual place where the fact I want to add on wikipedia page happened. WM2: You're dumb, WM1 just told you Facebook can't be a primary source. Go away. ME: I can be dumb but I still think Facebook may be a primary and reliable source.The guideline that most directly relates to whether a given source is reliable is Wikipedia:Reliable sources.. It has an explanatory supplement at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, listing the outcomes of many consensus discussions at this noticeboard.; The policy that most directly relates is: Verifiability.; If your question is …The site’s rules on reliable sources state: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published, sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared ...1.2 Cocotama's Arabic Wikipedia article. 2 comments. 1.3 Interwiki problem. 6 comments. 1.4 HOW TO UPLOAD A PICTURE IN A PAGE. 3 comments. 1.5 Ip adress. 3 comments. 1.6 2019 European Parliament election in France. 3 comments. 1.7 Editing Reflist. 3 comments. 1.8 Restore Amir Ali Shaik Page. 2 comments. 1.9 Is there going to be an end …Answer 12 days ago Reliability of Wikipedia compared to other academic research sources Wikipedia is often considered less reliable than other academic research sources due to the following reasons: Open editing: Wikipedia allows anyone to edit and contribute to its articles.From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The largest extant species of bird measured by mass is the common ostrich ( Struthio camelus ), closely followed by the Somali ostrich ( Struthio molybdophanes ).The New Encyclopedia Britannica by Encyclopaedia Britannica (Compiled by) Call Number: AE5 .E363 2010. ISBN: 9781593398378. Publication Date: 2009-09-01. Almost every student, faculty member, and librarian knows from experience how valuable Wikipedia can actually be when looking for quick background information about almost any topic.Reliability: State whether there is consensus that the source is generally reliable, generally unreliable, or deprecated . If there is no consensus, use neutral wording (e.g. "no consensus on the reliability of Source" instead of "no consensus that Source is reliable" ).According to research conducted over the years — including a scientific study published by the journal Nature in 2005 and a report commissioned by the site's Wikimedia Foundation in 2012 —...Wikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source of information. It has no formal peer review and yes, anyone with a phone/computer and …

Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources, only reliable sources such as official statements or credible media will be used for this article. There will be citations of Reddit posts. Per Wikipedia:No original research, there will be no speculative writing in this article. Per Wikipedia:Biographies of living people, under which articles for Hololive talents will fall, …

An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has up an article chatting with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. Wales views the Wikipedia site as an educational resource, and apparently thinks teachers who downplay the site are 'bad educators'. '[A] perceived lack of authority ... has drawn criticism from other ...In fact, Wikipedia systematically compensates for the lack of credentials by heavy emphasis on reliable sources. It is a paradox: Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular websites in the world according to TopSites, and by most measures it is the most widely read knowledge repository on Earth, but still it is often treated as not worth academic ...Wikipedia is an open-source, openly edited online encyclopedia created in 2001. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia featuring openly editable content created and sourced by users from around ...Answer 12 days ago Reliability of Wikipedia compared to other academic research sources Wikipedia is often considered less reliable than other academic research sources due to the following reasons: Open editing: Wikipedia allows anyone to edit and contribute to its articles.Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Mail. -- Guy Macon ( talk ) 22:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist. For popular articles, Wikipedia's online community of volunteers, administrators and bots ensure edits are based on reliable citations. Popular articles are reviewed thousands of times.As a university student, you are expected to use credible sources in your assessments and course work. A credible source is one that is written by someone who is an expert in their discipline and is free of errors and bias. This guide explains the difference between credible, scholarly and peer-reviewed sources.This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.

Ncaa mens schedule.

Jalen wilson stats today.

Get reliable guidance, insight, and easy-to-understand explanations, written, edited, and verified to Britannica’s exacting standards. Advocacy for Animals Presenting Advocacy for Animals , a blog focused primarily on animal rights, wildlife conservation, environmental health and safety, and the legal and cultural issues related to these topics.Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.8 sept 2023 ... Most Wikipedia entries include footnotes, links to source materials ... ruins or compromises a mostly reliable system of free knowledge, it's ...accuracy reliability Recommended Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing …Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.Do sources have to be free, online and/or conveniently available to me? No. Sources can be expensive, print-only, or available only in certain places. A source does not stop being reliable simply because you personally aren't able to obtain a copy. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/cost.Feb 8, 2017 · The site’s rules on reliable sources state: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published, sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared ... Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case). 1 Images without reliable source. 7 comments. 2 1973 Average Math Score. 1 comment. 3 SAT International. 1 comment. 4 Raw scores, scaled scores, and percentiles. 3 comments. 5 Who can do an SAT test? 2 comments. 6 Creativity and stress. Toggle Creativity and stress subsection 6.1 Stress. 7 "IQ correlation" section.You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at Wikipedia:Verifiability and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ….

Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Mail. -- Guy Macon ( talk ) 22:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist. Wikipedia doesn’t require any credentials or experience to edit. This means anyone with an internet connection can edit and add content. Many Wikipedia editors are fueled by passion and hidden agendas, not a desire to create unbiased coverage. 3 Reasons why Wikipedia is not a reliable source: Wikipedia’s editing structure; Lack of fact-checkingWikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source of information. It has no formal peer review and anyone with a phone/computer and internet access can edit its …In today’s fast-paced digital world, staying updated with the latest news is essential. With so much information available at our fingertips, it can be overwhelming to find reliable sources and keep track of all the news that matters to you...Saraswati, is a Sanskrit fusion word of saras (सरस्) meaning "pooling water", but also sometimes translated as "speech"; and vati (वती) meaning "she who possesses". Originally associated with the river or rivers known as Saraswati, this combination, therefore, means "she who has ponds, lakes, and pooling water" or occasionally ...Take, for example, the one so called "reliable source" that was cited as grounds for calling the project dormant, which is from September 2014. That's a year out of date and completely irrelevant, and absolutely should not be considered to trump a much more recent primary source. Sprhodes 15:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) ReplyList of contemporary Islamic scholars. Aminu Ibrahim Daurawa. Muhammad Auwal Albani Zaria. Sani Umar Rijiyar Lemo. Abd al-Hamid Kishk. Ahmad al-Tayyeb. Ahmad Muhammad Shakir. Muhammad Metwalli al-Sha'rawi. Muhammad Sayyid Tantawy.The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ...The Free Dictionary is an American online dictionary and encyclopedia that aggregates information from various sources. It is accessible in fourteen languages. History. The Free Dictionary was launched in 2005 by Farlex. In the ... is done to avoid duplicate content in the search-engine results and prevent user traffic that would otherwise go to Wikipedia. …Evaluating Digital Sources. Because so much information is now available online, it’s important to know how to navigate digital sources versus print sources. Today, almost every print source has a digital edition (e.g., ebooks, online newspapers), and some academic journals only publish digitally. However, despite the many credible digital ... Wikipedia reliable source, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]