Retractionwatch

Dec 20, 2022 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.

The Retraction Watch Database was searched for all retracted publications in the subject category “Radiology/Imaging" (no beginning date limit, search update until April 27, 2022). Reasons for retraction were extracted using standardized coding taxonomy. The number of citations per retracted publication was determined.WHAT IS RETRACTION WATCH: This short video by John Bond of Riverwinds Consulting talks about Retraction Watch. FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publish...We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Retraction Watch introduces Hijacked Journal Checker. (29 May 2022) Hijacked journals mimic legitimate journals by adopting their titles, ISSNs, and other metadata. Usually, hijacked journals mirror legitimate journals without permission from the original journal. In rare instances, publishers will buy rights to a legitimate journal but ...Dec 21, 2021 · Retraction Watch. Since the start of the pandemic, journals have retracted more than 200 COVID-19–related papers and counting, most of them in 2021. But such papers represent only about 5 percent of the more than 3,000 retractions we’ve indexed this year in the Retraction Watch Database. In what has become an annual tradition, here we ...

The Retraction Watch Weekly, Dec. 11, 2023. Cyberstalking, Harvard, and PubPeer; sports research group will earn third retraction; Hindawi name being sunsetted …The analysis, an update of one conducted in December, used the Retraction Watch database, augmented with retraction notices collated from the Dimensions database, and involved assistance from ...Apr 24, 2022 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Retraction Watch Database. The Retraction Watch Database. News: Crossref has acquired the Retraction Watch Database, making it freely available. Click here for more information. Please review the User Guide before using the data and consider a U.S. tax-deductible donation to help us to continue to update and improve this important resource. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Should you wish to reference the Retraction Watch Web, we suggest the following as a basic form (of course, different citation styles may require different formatting) : One Retraction Watch Database [Internet]. New York: The Centered for Analytical Integrity. 2018. ISSN: 2692-465X. [Cited (applicable date)].

The Retraction Watch Database was searched for all retracted publications in the subject category “Radiology/Imaging" (no beginning date limit, search update until April 27, 2022). Reasons for retraction were extracted using standardized coding taxonomy. The number of citations per retracted publication was determined.Welcome to The Retraction Watch Weekly. This newsletter is designed to keep you up to date on what’s going on at Retraction Watch and elsewhere, while giving you a chance to declutter your inbox — and provide support for our work. (You can always subscribe to our free daily digest.) If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider ...We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.

353tv.

What Is Retraction Watch? A New Watchdog! In December 2014, the MacArthur Foundation gave $400,000 to support the expansion of a popular blog called Retraction Watch. Launched in 2010 by science writer Adam Marcus, and medical journalist and global editorial director of MedPage Today, Ivan Oransky, the blog …We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Retraction Watch Database. The Retraction Watch Database. News: Crossref has acquired the Retraction Watch Database, making it freely available. Click here for more information. Please review the User Guide before using the data and consider a U.S. tax-deductible donation to help us to continue to update and improve this important resource. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. 37,707 likes · 267 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process.

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.The Retraction Watch team takes a look at the most important publishing mistakes this year. Paper Used in Creationist Teaching Retracted After 30 Years. Ashley Yeager | Nov 11, 2019 | 2 min read. Criticism of the paper first surfaced in 1994, and its author was accused of scientific misconduct.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Welcome to The Retraction Watch Weekly. This newsletter is designed to keep you up to date on what’s going on at Retraction Watch and elsewhere, while giving …Crossref, a not-for-profit organization that facilitates research discovery and citation, has acquired the Retraction Watch database, a comprehensive database of …We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.— Retraction Watch (@Retraction Watch) November 10, 2021. Retraction notifications in a reference management database is not a new concept. It has been available for Zotero users for a couple of years. You can learn more about Zotero’s use of the Retraction Watch database here.

The Retraction Watch Weekly. Subscribe. A weekly roundup of news from Retraction Watch and elsewhere about scientific misconduct, integrity, and publishing. Click to read The …

Share. “In 1997, just 44 journals reported retracting a paper. By 2016, that number had grown more than 10-fold, to 488,” according to a new analysis of RetractionDatabase.org in Science ... We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The Retraction Watch team takes a look at the most important publishing mistakes this year. Paper Used in Creationist Teaching Retracted After 30 Years. Ashley Yeager | Nov 11, 2019 | 2 min read. Criticism of the paper first surfaced in 1994, and its author was accused of scientific misconduct.Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch reports on scientific paper retractions and maintains a database of retractions. Retraction Watch's parent organization, the Center for Scientific Integrity, promotes transparency in science and scientific publishing. To get the most out of searching the database, look through the Retraction Watch Database ...— Retraction Watch (@Retraction Watch) November 10, 2021. Retraction notifications in a reference management database is not a new concept. It has been available for Zotero users for a couple of years. You can learn more about Zotero’s use of the Retraction Watch database here.Bioethics. 2012 Jul;26(6):ii. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01986.x. Author Udo SchüklenkWe would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.

1015.

Garden city dermatology.

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Longtime Retraction Watch readers may recall that in 2016, a researcher noted PLOS ONE ’s correction rate was much higher than that at other journals. He and others chalked that up to the lack of an author proof stage, which is common at other journals. Knutson explained why the journal was reversing the policy: We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.A blog post by the co-founders of Retraction Watch, a database of retractions, criticizes the scientific community for not doing enough to prevent and correct …We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Retraction Watch. March 21st, 2024, 07:00 am. Exclusive: PLOS ONE to correct 1,000 papers, add author proof step. The megajournal PLOS ONE will be correcting about …We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. ….

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.May 24, 2022 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Share. “In 1997, just 44 journals reported retracting a paper. By 2016, that number had grown more than 10-fold, to 488,” according to a new analysis of RetractionDatabase.org in Science ...We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Retraction Watch maintains a database of more than 47,000 retracted studies. Should the court choose to undermine the FDA, it will be the result of a tragic … Retractionwatch, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]