Did you know?

In an attempt to clarify, the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund ruled that permits are required not just for direct point-source discharges, but also for any point-source discharge that is the “functional equivalent” of a direct point-source discharge.A 2020 court case was pivotal in further determining how to regulate pollutant discharges to groundwater and subsequently to waters of the United States (WOTUS). Subsequent cases have added uncertain...Hawaii Wildlife Fund - Harvard Law Review. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. In an attempt to resolve a years-long dispute over the scope of the Clean Water Act’s 1 (CWA) point source pollution permitting program, the Environmental Protection Agency published an “Interpretive Statement” that spanned seventeen pages of the Federal ...CONCLUSION. The court denies the motion to dismiss and the motion to strike exhibits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 8, 2012. /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui; Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 17

Join us for a Courthouse Steps teleforum on the oral argument for County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Glenn Roper will examine how the argument. ... Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Nov 8 2019.County of Maui versus the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Mr. Lin. ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELBERT LIN. ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER: MR. LIN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please …In 2020, the fate of the nation's clean water hung in the balance in County of Maui v. Hawaiʻi Wildlife Fund. Ultimately, the nation's highest court sided ...Lions are the majestic mammals known for strength and power. Here are 10 cool facts about lions, aCC0rding to the World Wildlife Fund and Just Fun Facts. Size matters in the animal kingdom with lions being the second largest cat in the worl...No. 18-260 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _____ COUNTY OF MAUI, Petitioner, v. HAWAI'I WILDLIFE FUND, ET AL., Respondents. _____ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States

See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a draft memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ... ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. County of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund. Possible cause: Not clear county of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund.

Plaintiffs Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, and West Maui Preservation Association move for summary judgment, arguing that the undisputed …2022] County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 553 the Court’s decision in County of Maui does create a broad rule, it is the right decision by the Court to ensure States’ rights and the purpose of the CWA remains intact. The language of the CWA is intended to be vague and See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020

In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that when there is a “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” from a point source to navigable waters, an appropriate permit is required under the CWA. This ruling, according to several policy experts, is expected to cause future uncertainties and continued ...County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund - Regulatory. U.S. Supreme Court. The NFIB Legal Center filed an amicus brief in this case emphasizing that the Clean Water Act should be interpreted narrowly to protect federalism. The brief argued that a permit is not required for the discharge of pollutants if there is no surface connection to ...Opinion for Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, 881 F.3d 754 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v. Suffolk County, 600 F.3d 180 (2d Cir. 2010) (3 times) View All Authorities Share Support FLP ...

rubber feet lowe's May 26, 2021 · Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020). The Supreme Court provided examples of when there would be and when there would not be a "functional equivalent of a direct discharge," explaining that time and distance are important: masters in diversity equity and inclusionrylee davis Hawaii Wildlife Fund (2020) that expanded §402 jurisdiction over industrial discharges into unregulated groundwater that is subsequently indirectly conveyed (through groundwater) into WOTUS. In the Maui case, the court held that such indirect discharges are covered by §402 if they are the "functional equivalent" of direct discharges into ... phil steele all big 12 The opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2019 (October 07, 2019, through October 04, 2020).Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final …This CLE course will discuss the Supreme Court's decision in County of Maui, Hawai'i. v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund, which sets forth a new test for when discharges to jurisdictional waters via groundwater require NPDES permitting under the Clean Water Act (CWA): when the discharge to groundwater is the "functional equivalent of direct discharge."This program will discuss and debate the critical ... medical shadowing near mebasics of astrophysics1500 meter race The oral argument for County of Maui, Hawaii v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund was heard before the Supreme Court on November 6, 2019.The issue at hand is: "Whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater." ku basketball student tickets County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Your name/. Your company. dd/mm/yyyy ... byu accounting rankingswhat is leadership in educationiowa state vs kansas football On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups ... The County of Maui appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision and argued that the CWA's permittingCounty of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Its Impact on Clean Water Act Jurisprudence. Authors. Sydney Bale. Recommended Citation. Sydney Bale, County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Its Impact on Clean Water Act Jurisprudence, 7 Oil & Gas, Nat. Resources & Energy J. 551 (2022), ...