Grammaticality

In general, I think people use "two times more likely" to mean the same thing as "two times as likely" and "twice as likely," but I believe I've encountered a peeve where people object to this use of "two times more likely" and say that it "logically" should mean "three times as likely" (because one plus two is three).

As a preposition, "below" would be written after "information" as a stranded preposition.While typically prepositions would precede the noun, stranded prepositions can occur "in interrogative or relative clauses, where the interrogative or relative pronoun that is the preposition's complement is moved to the start".grammaticality; questions; conversation; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Aug 2, 2012 at 13:44. MetaEd. 28.3k 17 17 gold badges 85 85 silver badges 138 138 bronze badges. asked Aug 2, 2012 at 9:23. Vinayak Kolagi Vinayak Kolagi. 151 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 5 5 bronze badges. 2.grammaticality; questions; conversation; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Aug 2, 2012 at 13:44. MetaEd. 28.3k 17 17 gold badges 85 85 silver badges 138 138 bronze badges. asked Aug 2, 2012 at 9:23. Vinayak Kolagi Vinayak Kolagi. 151 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 5 5 bronze badges. 2.Well formed; in accordance with the rules of the grammar of a language. correct. acceptable. allowable. idiomatic. well formed. “It makes a grammatical sentence that correctly expresses the intended meaning.”. Find more words!1. Yes, "hello." is a valid utterance on its own. No, interjections do not constitute "full sentences" or "complete sentences" in the sense in which those phrases are typically used. For instance, when a teacher asks one to write in "complete sentences," I do not believe "Hello." would be an acceptable sentence.The antecedent is the person or thing that the pronoun refers back to. For example, in the sentence " David came by; he was looking for you," the personal pronoun "he" agrees with its antecedent "David" because it is: Singular: David is one person. Third-person: David is not the person speaking or being spoken to.Apr 14, 2017 · transformationalism have approached the question of grammaticality, meaningfulness, and acceptability. It sheds light on the nature of meaning and how it can be realized in an act of written or spoken communication. Grammaticality, Meaningfulness, and Acceptability: A Historical Perspective American Research Journal of English and Literature Page 2 As nouns the difference between grammaticality and acceptability. is that grammaticality is the state or attribute of obeying the rules of grammar; grammatical correctness while acceptability is the quality of being acceptable; acceptableness.

This paper provides a critical review of the state of the art in code-switching research being conducted in linguistics. Three issues of theoretical and practical importance are explored: (a) code-switching vs. borrowing; (b) grammaticality; and (c) variability vs. uniformity, and I take a position on all three issues. Regarding switching vs. …In your example. This is the first time I ate sushi. (This was the first time I had sushi). the past is used since it is something you have already done, even if only a few moments ago.Relative (un)grammaticality is an ever-changing property of the stimulus, whereas absolute (un)grammaticality is stable. In both readings of the term, grammaticality is defined by something that is external to the stimulus (be it the grammar of a specific language or principles of general/linguistic cognition), and it is not an inextricable ...Grammaticality Judgment This subtest assesses the examinee's ability to identify grammatically incorrect or correct sentences. Following identification of an incorrect sentence, the examinee is required to fix one word of the sentence without altering the overall sentence meaning. The sentence is provided orally with no supplemental pictures.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Oct 20, 2015 at 0:42. Drew. 15.2k 9 9 gold badges 37 37 silver badges 61 61 bronze badges. asked Oct 19, 2015 at 22:52. Bart Louwers Bart Louwers. 151 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. 7. I mean in the sense I use it here. Not "The number two is even."GRAMMATICALITY. In LINGUISTICS, conformity to the rules of a language as formulated by a GRAMMAR based on a theory of language description. Source for information on GRAMMATICALITY: Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language dictionary. @Cameron - you saved my day! This is exactly what I was lurking for but couldn't find! I wanted to use "polysyndeton" because of a technical limitation that didn't allow me to put a comma after a word (it was comma after the HTML link which is not part of the link but some software would interpret it as a part of the link).

1 Answer. Sorted by: 14. Both sentences are possible. Zustimmung und Ablehnung ist sehr wichtig. Zustimmung und Ablehnung sind sehr wichtig. In the first sentence, " Zustimmung and Ablehnung " are regarded as a unit. This is known as 'synesis' in linguistics. In the second sentence, they are viewed separately.In descriptive grammar, the term ungrammatical refers to an irregular word group or sentence structure that makes little apparent sense because it disregards the syntactic conventions of the language. Contrast with grammaticality . In language studies (and on this website), examples of ungrammatical constructions are usually preceded by ...Positioning adverbs is a complex affair. There are some rules of thumb, but for many adverbs, it is quite acceptable to place it before or after the verb.In this case, I think either way is acceptable, though I would probably find the former more natural, i.e.notion of (un)grammaticality, on the one hand, and the observations of (un)acceptability ratings, on the other, can entertain in fact rather complex interactions. That is, the relation betweenCommas have a particular grammatical purpose: a pair of commas separates parenthetical content from the main sentence. Normally there might be a slight pause at the commas when reading the sentence, but a slight pause when reading is not a reason to introduce a comma when the grammar does not require it.. The book title, Book, is not parenthetical content in your sentence; in my sentence here ...1 Answer. Both versions are perfectly fine. I will send you an email. "you" is an indirect object. It is understood that the subject is not sending "you", but rather sending the email. I will send an email to you. sounds a little stilted. In conversational English, you would probably use email as a verb. I will email you.

When does ku jayhawks play again.

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Sep 9, 2020 at 17:43. Questioner Questioner. 113 2 2 gold badges 3 3 silver badges 7 7 bronze badges. 2. Your two examples seem to differ only in the word "rather", which, in that context, means approximately "on the contrary".Whether you are a student, a professional, or someone who simply enjoys writing, it’s important to ensure that your sentences are clear and free from grammatical errors. One way to achieve this is by utilizing a grammar check tool.Show 2 more comments. 6. The minus sign is always the leftmost: - (rest of the symbols). The currency symbol is always adjacent to the figure: € (amount). To avoid ambiguity and help readability, one may place the minus sign in parentheses: (-) €6.680.1 Answer. Both versions are perfectly fine. I will send you an email. "you" is an indirect object. It is understood that the subject is not sending "you", but rather sending the email. I will send an email to you. sounds a little stilted. In conversational English, you would probably use email as a verb. I will email you.Grammatical Rules and Grammaticality. 1. Using your intuitions about grammaticality in English, decide whether the following sentences are grammatical (acceptable) or ungrammatical by the rules of English. Note that there may be some borderline cases or some structures that while once ungrammatical are gaining acceptance as the language …

grammaticality; pronouns; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 20, 2021 at 0:04. JEL. 32.6k 4 4 gold badges 66 66 silver badges 108 108 bronze badges. asked Jun 15, 2011 at 21:30. rest_day rest_day. 4,093 8 8 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 39 39 bronze badges. 5. 13.grammaticality; expressions; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Oct 1, 2013 at 14:43. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Sep 30, 2013 at 14:12. CreativeWriting CreativeWriting.grammaticality in British English. (ɡrəmætɪˈkælɪtɪ ) 名词. (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness. examples where the grammaticality of a sentence was connected to the beliefs of the speaker. Collins English Dictionary. You might occasionally hear "me, too" in this situation, but only in casual conversation. Most native English speakers would say "me neither" -- saying "me too" might even suggest you've mis-heard the speaker in some cases, thinking they'd said "I can understand", rather than "I can't understand".. Aside: You will also hear some people say "me either", more commonly in American English.Grammaticality: Speaker intuitions about whether a chunk of language is ‘correct’, ‘well-formed’, ‘valid’, or ‘understandable’ in their language Prescriptively Ungrammatical : A judgment that a chunk of language is ‘wrong’ or ‘incorrect’ on the basis of social, societal, contextual, or academic ‘rules’.May 20, 2015 · Grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) have been used to elicit data reflecting second language (L2) speakers’ knowledge of L2 grammar. However, the exact constructs measured by GJTs, whether primarily implicit or explicit knowledge, are disputed and have been argued to differ depending on test-related variables (i.e., time pressure and item grammaticality). A language is husserlian if one synonym can be substituted for another synonym without changing the grammaticality of the result. For example, no husserlian language can have synonyms 'likely' and 'probable' where: 'It is likely that the Spurs will win' is grammatical. 'It is probable that the Spurs will win' is grammatical. But:Visit of sounds like it should be followed by who was doing the visit, for example:. The visit of the president went flawlessly, the president is safe. Visit at and visit to both sound fine to me, with the minor difference that one of them implies the distance traveled, like in the following examples:. I went to Europe last year. = My visit to Europe last year was great.It is not acceptable in formal or academic writing. (Typically.) There are exceptions. @oosterwal, @tcovo, and @wooble give good examples of perfectly valid constructions starting with especially (or in wooble's case, starting with because).. An example with because:. Because of the necessity of lowering their their baskets to the cave floor daily, the Pitifoo began to develop ingenious ...ADDED: There is now also a related thread that is attempting to address the grammaticality of the expression "our today's meeting": Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?-- Though, personally (F.E.), I haven't found their arguments for proving that it is ungrammatical to be convincing.grammaticality-in-context; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 9, 2018 at 8:48. M.A.R. 7,351 7 7 gold badges 39 39 silver badges 67 67 bronze badges. asked Apr 9, 2018 at 4:46. Tsundere Yukimura Tsundere Yukimura. 21 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. 5. 2.

There is nothing stopping you from thinking of the pronoun neither as a shorter way of saying neither one where neither is functioning as a determiner.Neither one is obviously a phrase that's singular, therefore, according to the subject-verb agreement rule, the verb that goes along with the subject must be in its singular form if the subject itself is singular.

May 9, 2016 · Perhaps next time, tag for both grammaticality and grammar, lest your nonconformity to tagging etiquette irk the ire of those who would accuse you of opportunistic pendanticality. "A speaker's linguistic competence, which is the knowledge that they have of their language, allows them to easily judge whether a sentence is grammatical or ... In linguistics, grammaticality is determined by the conformity to language usage as derived by the grammar of a particular speech variety. The notion of grammaticality rose alongside the theory of generative grammar, the goal of which is to formulate rules that define well-formed, grammatical, … See more3. (US English) In Case 1, the only one that is both correct and common is #4. In Case 2, the ones that are both correct and common are #1, #4, and #5. However, you would never use #5 unless you knew that Mr. Smith likes to be referred to in this way. Some people adopt their middle name as their "handle", and downplay their given first name.The simple agreement rule* is that the number of the verb should correspond to the number of the grammatical subject. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (p499) states the rule as follows:. In simple agreement, the verb agrees with a subject with the form of an NP (noun phrase) whose person-number classification derives from its head noun.1. Both are correct. They can have different meanings. You are my favorite person, too. or. You are my favorite person too. This adds to a previous statement. Perhaps the addressee had told the speaker that he was his favorite person. Or perhaps the speaker had said that the addressee is a third party's favorite person.Grammaticality ratings were judged by the authors, and through crowd sourcing. A four-category ordinal scale is used for rating the sentences. To predict sentence acceptability, they apply a linear regression model that draws features from spelling errors, an N -gram model, precision grammar parsers, and the Stanford PCFG parser.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jul 2, 2019 at 3:13. Jason Bassford. 37.9k 5 5 gold badges 52 52 silver badges 90 90 bronze badges. asked Jul 1, 2019 at 21:36. Ann Olive Ann Olive. 11 2 2 bronze badges. 7. 1. There's nothing technically wrong with it. Either accept it or reorder the sentence to avoid it.An equally powerful source of resistance to indeterminacy stemmed from a new concern with situating language users within the causal order of the physical and social worlds, the latter encompassing extra-linguistic activities and techniques with their own standards of success and failure. A central work in this trend was Naming and Necessity (1980), by the American philosopher Saul Kripke ...Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik have the following in their A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (pp. 462-463):. Most adjectives that are inflected for their comparison can also take the periphrastic forms with more and most.With more, they seem to do so more easily when they are predicative and are followed by a than-clause:. John is more mad than Bob is.1 Answer. The presence or absence of even certainly does change the meaning. Larceny occurs when... suggests that what follows is the definition of larceny. Larceny occurs even when... implies that the victim's lack of capacity might be expected to mean that the action was not larceny. It's not clear what you mean by 'in the beginning'.

585 25 1 2 rd.

Kansas city online schools.

Lesion analysis revealed that posterior temporal areas were more reliably implicated in poor grammaticality judgment performance than anterior areas, but poor performance was also observed with some anterior lesions, suggesting that areas important for syntactic processing are distributed throughout the left peri-sylvian region.@CutieKrait: I knew what you meant by "idea". Note that it's irrelevant whether the thing you're asking for is a method of proving something difficult to establish conclusively, or of overcoming/dealing with some major problem ("Do you have any idea how to balance our budget?").The implications I mentioned are often present, and the …The grammaticality of an expression, on the standard generative Essentialist view, is the status conferred on it by the competence state of an ideal speaker. But competence can never be exercised or used without potentially interfering performance factors like memory being exercised as well. This means that judgments about grammaticality are ...You're varying two things: 1. whether you put the phrase in commas; and 2. whether you insert the word "as". So really, there are four possibilities here: +commas +as, +commas -as, -commas +as, -commas -as. I'm going to insert the other two possibilities into your question.1. This is a matter of preference. Activity is one of those odd nouns which is singular but can stand in for a plural. "We are tracking his activity" and "We are tracking his activities" are very close, but the latter implies tracking the individual granular components of his overall activity rather than his general status.They are equivalent; upon is just a more formal term for on, and it is especially used in abstract senses. The copy of the NOAD I can access on my Mac via the Dictionary app reports the following note about the usage of upon.. The preposition upon has the same core meaning as the preposition on.Upon is sometimes more formal than on, however, and is preferred in the phrases once upon a time and ...Oxford's dictionary entry states this meaning and usage as valid, though it warns that some people think it is incorrect:. Although this is the most common use of hopefully, it is a fairly new use and some people think it is not correct. It is worth noting that this usage has been accepted by oxford.1. Yes, "hello." is a valid utterance on its own. No, interjections do not constitute "full sentences" or "complete sentences" in the sense in which those phrases are typically used. For instance, when a teacher asks one to write in "complete sentences," I do not believe "Hello." would be an acceptable sentence.1. Both of them are correct. We can use either one of them to ask a question about the future. Some grammars call #1 the "going to" future, and suggest that we use it when talking about something that has been planned or arranged (we have taken some step to make something happen). They may call #2 the present continuous and say that we …@CutieKrait: I knew what you meant by "idea". Note that it's irrelevant whether the thing you're asking for is a method of proving something difficult to establish conclusively, or of overcoming/dealing with some major problem ("Do you have any idea how to balance our budget?").The implications I mentioned are often present, and the usage itself is invariably highly informal, even when it ...Grammaticality definition: (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples ….

Jan 17, 2013 at 14:14. 1. But @BillFranke the OP is asking whether the second line can be used at all ("The people (of which there are many, many)"). My answer is no, it can't, but I couldn't tell you why. Good question. - JAM. Jan 17, 2013 at 14:51. 1. @JAM: Sure the second line can be used in colloquial English.Perhaps next time, tag for both grammaticality and grammar, lest your nonconformity to tagging etiquette irk the ire of those who would accuse you of opportunistic pendanticality. "A speaker's linguistic competence, which is the knowledge that they have of their language, allows them to easily judge whether a sentence is grammatical or ...grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Jun 9, 2016 at 16:31. Steve Steve. 33 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 3 3 bronze badges. 2. Could you give a little more context to the question? Is the testing occurring inside the program itself or are you testing the program as a user.Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms. By. Richard Nordquist. Updated on February 12, 2020. In linguistics (particularly in generative grammar ), the term grammaticality refers to the conformity of a sentence to the rules defined by a specific grammar of a language .grammaticality; verbs; email; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jun 5, 2012 at 8:41. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Jun 5, 2012 at 7:18. Saurabh Saurabh. 151 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 5 5 bronze badges. 1. Related: Where did CC: come from?1. They are both correct. However "can" entails the issue of "possibility". If you ask someone "can you" it is as if you're wondering if they are capable of doing it. "May" is typically used for requests, but I will definitely side with WindowsDude7 right above! "Could" is definitely your best shot if you want to express politeness :)31‏/08‏/2023 ... ... grammaticality; that is, the extent to which utterances follow the grammatical rules of a language. The participants in the study were 40 ...Your two examples don't really differ in degree of formality, but they certainly differ in meaning. "it is a bit urgent" is not great grammar, so actually comes off as slightly less formal, but because you said "a bit" you have made it seem less urgent than simply "it is …grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jul 23, 2011 at 1:26. Tim. asked Jul 23, 2011 at 0:28. Tim Tim. 9,963 65 65 gold badges 148 148 silver badges 195 195 bronze badges. Add a comment | 1 Answer Sorted by: Reset to default 4 Either works from a grammatical perspective, but usually a native speaker would say ...Markers of definiteness and indefiniteness generally indicate whether or not the addressee is expected to be able to identify the referent of a noun phrase (see Krámský 1972, Hawkins 1978, Heine ... Grammaticality, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]